This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.
Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.
We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.
By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.
The UK Supreme Court recently considered issues around eligibility of certain foreign nationals for certain benefits and housing assistance.
In Samin v Westminster City Council [2016] UKSC 1 the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal which sought to incorporate a proportionality requirement into the statutory test for eligibility, and to argue that the test itself was discriminatory under EU law.
Housing Rights has recently responded to a Housing Executive consultation on their draft Rural Policy Proposals.
Housing Rights welcomes the Executive’s ongoing acknowledgement of the need for specific policies on rural housing, and supports the overarching vision of the proposals: ‘Housing Services working in partnership to enable and support vibrant, shared and sustainable rural communities and provide economic, social and environmental benefits in rural areas.’ Comments were offered on several specific elements of the proposals:
Support for Mortgage Interest (‘SMI’) is a payment available to people receiving Income Support; income-based Jobseekers’ Allowance; income-based Employment & Support Allowance; and Pension Credit. These payments are vital in allowing low-income households to maintain their mortgage repayments and sustain their homes.
The next few years will see several changes to the SMI scheme, specifically:
The Housing Executive an Women’s Aid have developed a joint working protocol with the aim of promoting and enhancing the safety of those who have experienced domestic and/or sexual violence and abused through increased awareness, collaborative working and effective and efficient referral.
Research published by Homeless Link, an umbrella organisation for homeless charities in England, shows that the proposal to remove automatic entitlement to housing benefit from 18 to 21 year olds could have a devastating impact on vulnerable young people.
James is 20 years old and a very vulnerable young adult. He spent time in care growing up, and has struggled with mental health issues in his life.
James had a tenancy with a housing association, but unfortunately experienced intimidation, threats and antisocial behavior at the property. He became frightened to stay there and ended up staying with his Aunt, where he felt safe.
Carmel Ferguson, Housing Rights solicitor, looks at the case of Samuels v Birmingham City Council, in which a homeless applicant challenged the local authority's decision that she was intentionally homeless because she had been evicted from a previous property due to rent arrears. The original decision maker had felt that Ms Samuels's rent was affordable when compared with her income.
Our Community Housing Advice Partnership recently received a call from a support worker at MACS. MACS is an organisation that helps young people who haven't had a fair deal. This particular call from MACS was about Paul, a vulnerable 20 year old who currently had nowhere permanent to live.
A few months back we received a call from a very distressed young woman. Louise had been assaulted by her partner. She was 12 weeks pregnant at the time of the assault.