As part of the work of the Housing Repossessions Taskforce, the Department for Communities asked the Behavioural Insights Team to develop and test a range of behavioural interventions to increase customer contact and engagement. The aim of the research was to test the potential for applying behavioural insights to correspondence with customers as a way to increase the likelihood of their subsequent engagement. To this end they conducted a series of randomised control trials (RCT), widely held to be the ‘gold standard’ in research in collaboration with two lenders.
The objective of the research was to increase the rate of successful contact between banks and customers entering or already in arrears. Successful contact includes inbound contact from the customer, and outbound contact from the bank being answered. Of secondary importance, payment behaviour was also monitored to ensure it did not reduce as a consequence of the correspondence, though increasing payments was not a focus of the interventions.
Two trials were undertaken with Lender 1 (one with long-term arrears customers, and one with customers as they entered arrears), and one with Lender 2 (also with customers as they entered arrears).
Much official correspondence is poor at communicating exactly what the recipient should do. To address this, the trial letters put the important actions (i.e. to make contact) in bold and at the top of the letter. Background and supplementary information came after this.
Behavioural research shows that:
Details of the trials and their response rates are available in the full report. The BIT felt that this research demonstrated that behaviuoral insights can be used to improve correspondence between borrowers and customers facing arrears. The findings showed a statistically significant increase in successful contact rates, and while no positive impact on payment rates was measured, the new style of communication did not negatively impact payment rates. This is neither surprising nor disappointing, since the purpose of the letters was to elicit contact rather than payments. However it is also reassuring, as it was important to demonstrate that the intervention does not reduce payments. This was a risk given the relatively soft and approachable tone the letters took.
The report makes a number of recommendations for how lenders should communicate with borrowers, lessons that can equally be applied to any other sector where customers or clients are hard to reach or have a history of disengagement. BIT recommend that communications: